Whether this was your true intention or not, this part of your post implies looking at the role of Priestess which is why I raise the central theme of the OTO. Whatever you intended, I think it's important for everyone to fully know and understand what they might be getting into when joining a group of people they don't know.
And you ignored where I said I knew members of the order. I have spent time with people in the order. I have done a ritual with a few members of the order. So while they were not order rituals and practices (these interactions were in the form of a BTW outercourt/open ritual) I did have interactions with some in the order. So I did and do know people in the order. There is also the requirement in the minerval degree prior to initiation that you attend several public social gatherings, classes, and a few gnostic masses open to the public. This is done so you do get to know them and know if you will work well with them or not.
I was following the instructions given to me by the leader of the local OTO. I was given a list of reading materials and websites to search and read. What I had read got me interested in the group. I liked to church like organization structure of the order and I liked the structure they had set up.
When I said I was looking into the priesthood of that order I was doing the only research you can uninitiated. I was looking at where in the ranks of the hierarchy the priest and priestess were as well as the other positions/degree ranks in the order as I saw they had a organizational status that looked sort of like the Catholic Church with lay people, decons, and the like to the higher status.
Before I seriously considered initiation and training I wanted to familiarize myself with the lodge history and culture. I wanted to see what sort of work was involved with becoming heads of orders and really taking part in that church and order. I knew it was an entirely different religion than the witchcraft I was familiar with. What I had been reading and the rituals I had read seemed beautiful and worth exploring.
I wasn't going to get involved with a magical group if I had no understanding of the way it was set up. Knowing how the lodge works as an organization for me is as important as understanding the actual rites of the lodge. Knowing or being familiar with the rites of the organization is the other side of the coin when it comes to the preparation. Obviously I had not read the materials as closely as I thought I had when I was given the materials list.
This is for the benefit of everyone reading this post, especially young people who might be only looking at magical attainment on a superficial level, concerning themselves with degrees and titles over doing the real inner work.
My understanding is that you don't get the degrees and the titles if you don't do the work. If you ever thought that was my intent you are highly mistaken. I was looking at the lodge for the same reason I was looking at covens of various traditions. I was looking for a way to have face to face fellowship while doing spiritual work. The fellowship and the bonding after church is something I miss. I know that lodges and covens would provide that fellowship for me.
You seem to be advocating promiscuity as a panacea for trauma,
Not at all. That paragraph was all about me and my work. I was saying that by engaging in sexual activity with other people I may be able to overcome the sense of shame I have regarding sexual needs and desires. Its a remark on personal healing work and nothing more.
I would gently suggest that this might be a little misguided, ie a knee jerk response to pain rather than actual healing.
Maybe for some it would be. For most people I wouldn't advise being promiscuous. For most people having a stable relationship to work with the trauma is all they need and recommended. For many people it can also cause them more issues. For myself its not a big thing. We are in an open relationship where if we are honest and let them know about it, its not really a big deal. It just needs to be SSC (Safe, sane, Consensual).
There has been a kind of 'McDonaldisation' of 'occulture', of late, with many keen to get their taste of 'spiritual enlightenment' from the latest 'trendy' movement or 'guru' the counterculture (or bookstore) has to offer, for a fee, of course.
Well I do understand why there are fees for workshops at metaphysical centers. You have to pay for the rental of the space and for the time of the instructor as well. I do think that some of them are overpriced but there is nothing wrong with attending workshops at local bookstores and metaphysical centers. These workshops for many people are the only way they can get face to face training and education.
I do know what you are talking about though. I am not one of those people. I've been doing the spiritual work I have off and on for 15 years. I say off and on because my mental health occasionally gets in the way of my practices. I always manage to bring myself back to it though. Its often difficult and often takes a lot more work than I would like but in the end I always come back to my practices.
It was at least five years if not more ago that I learned the LBRP from the leader of the OTO at a local Pagan Pride Day. I do attend basically any workshop that I think is interesting or that I think I will get something out of. The idea is that by going to as many different workshops as I can I will learn practices from many different sources and be able to find my own way and use the information as is fitting in my practice.
To me, this type of structure is only useful if you need someone else to tell you how to think.
So you find no value in having teachers or attending workshops?
Always remember that Crowley died alone, estranged from his family and children, a lonely heroin addict in a boarding house in rainy old England. Not where Id like to end up really.
Poor choices on his part for most of it. I'm not saying he was a good man. All I was saying is that he was a brilliant occultist. Just because he was a terrible person to most of society doesn't mean that his occult teachings and works aren't valuable. You don't have to like a persons personality to admit that they did have skills and knowledge.
Gardner was a creepy old man. You don't see people attacking his teaching because of it though. I see Crowley in the same way. There may be things about their personalities you dont' like. That doesn't mean that they don't have something to teach that could be valuable.
Message from the Mod Team : part of this post was removed due to sexual content, which is not allowed as per forum rules